the Eagle Has Landed

KEEP CONNECTED:

Keep informed join the email list now through by clicking here. Or visit the hottest Facebook discussion group called Process Server's Big Blue Tent Everyone who strives for open and transparent discussion is welcome.

The Purpose:

The web site is by design to discuss the trade of process serving, this includes non profit associations that are granted tax exempt status related to their interest in the trade of process serving. It is designed to critically discuss the issue of process serving industry. It is non commercial. By design this page will be used to share with and petition government legislators and rule makers so they can be fully informed via direction to and interaction with its content as it may relate to their legislative or regulatory (civil or criminal) activities regarding process servers.

By Entering and remaining in this site:

By entering you agree that you will contact us at randyscott@randyscott.us with any questionable material for removal. You must be specific as to what in your opinion is improper and the basis or authority for it being improper.

Fair Use:

This is a non commercial interest and all material posted here will be used for the purpose above.

OUR user blog:

To interact and discuss any of the material here go to our blog for anonymous comments here.

Click here

crowe cookie jar

 

BRANCH OFFICE TAXABLE REVENUE EXPLAINED HERE IN THIS VIDEO


CLICK ON THE YOUTUBE ICON IN THE LOWER RIGHT OF THE VIDEO TO GET A CLEARER VIEW.

IRS Reporting Year Ending

If you are directed here from Twitter regarding NAPPS non profit tax exemption check back soon. A complete position on why NAPPS is not qualified for IRS tax exempt status and never has been will be placed here. An action has been instituted with the IRS and that will be appended to here within the month of September 2014.

Take a look at member fee reflected in the change of accounting year revenue:

2011_12_31=$399,833.00
2010_12_31=$373,803.00 (6 months only no correction year before or year after)(Updated here is Jason Orme Gary's Friend from TKW explanation. When you read it note he did not get into the year after. If his explanation holds water it sounds like in order to make profit in a business all your have to do is change your accounting years every once in a while. Because they way the letter states it you make as much in .5 of a year as you do in 1.5. I understand his reasoning just fell short by not identyfying the period of the correction. There has to be a correction somewhere. Doesn't make sense and my position stands. But I do take notice after 2 years of asking the question first time Crown produced something on close to on point.)
2010_06_30=$367,219.00
2009_06_30=$447,675.00

I updated this July 25, 2013 for you review of the tax forms. It is your choice if manipulations of over $350,000.00 of money matters or not. And if you choose to look at it the answer reasonable people will conclude is there is something criminally wrong with the reporting of these funds.

In this you will find that the member fees for the 6 month change of accounting 2010_12_31 period has the similar amount as the prior two years and the next year. Math does not allow this to be a simple mistake, it is extra money and it came from somewhere WHY? Where was it? This is a tell tale sign of fraud and may very well be the reason why an honorable NAPPS president was expelled in 2011, an honorable treasurer was removed from the board because they asked questions. This is WHY a required audit was vetoed by Tamaroff at Crowe bequest. An audit would likely lead to the identification of fraud.

Want to learn more about the $400,000.00 Here is the recent data involving the branch offices. (take special notice that it is under the section of the profit and loss statement called Advertising, yet to the IRS he calls it tax exempt program service revenue)

  • MOST SIGNIFICANT EVASION BRANCH OFFICE LISTINGS EQUAL AN EVASION OF TAXES IN THE AMOUNT OF OVER 400K IN THE LAST 5 YEARS. (View this as it relates to experienced opinion as to the additional branch offices revenue that Crowe is in charge of reporting to the IRS Lorman_Internet_Presentation.)

  • SECOND MOST SIGNIFICANT EVASION LOBBYING LEGISLATORS IS TAXABLE AND NAPPS HAS EVADED PAYING TAX RELATING TO SAME

  • THIRD MOST SIGNIFICANT EVASION EXCESS BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS CONTRACT.

In this letter from NAPPS consultant Talbot, Korvola and Warwick, LLP on December 11, 2011 they specifically inform NAPPS what is lobbying and taxable. What has NAPPS evaded tax on?

Has any person, chair of a committee, President of the association ever expended NAPPS funds to travel to a lobbying event?

1. President Yellon went to Illinois for the signing August 12, 2011.
2. Mr Perez attended Maryland to testify February 19, 2013.

If NAPPS funds paid for any part of this trip or expended resources in kind to make this happen under IRS rules it is all taxable. This section will expand to include many other examples in history.

2013_12_31

2012_12_31

2011_12_31

2010_12_31

2010_06_30

2009_06_30

2008_06_30

2007_06_30

2006_06_30

2005_06_30

Video on all the corporate filings over the years Non Profit to for profit to missing years to even knowing they were in Philly for a while too.

NAPPS Arizona State Filings

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

NAPPS Oregon foreign corporation reports

2009 2010 2011 2012

This page was last Updated Monday June 15, 2015 12:47 PM